In deciding what coffee to have this week, we decided to get a different coffee from the fine folks at the Second Chance Coffee Company with their I Have a Bean brand. I wrote about them a couple weeks ago.
http://javarunnerscoffeejourney.blogspot.com/2013/03/great-coffee-and-second-chance.html
Initially we tried their Ethiopian Yirgacheffe Adado FTO. That coffee had a tea-like quality. I liked it, but it isn't a coffee I would get on a regular basis. This time we got Peru Norte FTO.
In their descriptions of the coffee, chocolate places a pretty large role in the flavor and the aroma. According to their website:
"In the cup, the flavors chocolate, caramel and nut combine with the soft notes of fig and spice." "Flavors linger with a very pleasant, slightly smoky finish."
So what did I encounter in this coffee?
This coffee has more body and a stronger flavor than the Ethiopian. I suspect the roast is more of a darker roast. That comes though. When I opened the bag, my nose was struck by the smoky aroma, which I liked a great deal. If I like what I smell, then I can't want to start grinding it.
Maybe I have had too many caramels in my life, but I rarely taste that in my coffee. In this coffee, I get the sense of the chocolate, and the nutty flavor. Fig? I need to eat something other than Fig Newtons to know if I am tasting fig. (Note: for those new to the blog, I am a pretty basic "how does it taste" guy. Maybe I need some more refinement :-) )
Here is the bottom line - I love this coffee. I love the aroma when it is whole bean, when it is ground, and when it is in the cup. This is a fairly strong cup of coffee. On the face slapping scale 1-10, 1 being a mere brush, and 10 being a Cher slaps Nicholas Cage in "Moonstruck," this is a 7.
I Have a Bean is making some great coffee folks. Try some, and spread the word.
www.ihaveabean.com
Charlie
I have spent a lifetime enjoying coffee, now I want to really study it. Join me as I learn more about the art, science and joy of coffee. I am not a coffee expert, and I am only just approaching coffee geekdom.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Equality Thank You
Thank you Metropolis Coffee in Chicago. I saw this on your Facebook page.
Thank you Howard Schultz for standing up for LGBT people at your recent shareholder's meeting.
My partner Mark and I greatly appreciate all the support out there for marriage equality.
Charlie
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Win Tickets to CoffeeCon2013
CoffeeCON 2013 is coming soon, Saturday, May 4 to be exact. CoffeeCON is a one day event where coffee lovers like you and I gather and learn about all things coffee. I have been invited to be an official blogger of the event, and will be reporting on all the day’s activities.
Charlie
Saturday, March 23, 2013
"God in a Cup"
Adventures in exotic countries, three driven men on a quest, passion, betrayal, heartache, ego, and a Geisha, all sound like the makings of action adventure film, Instead this is a story about coffee. Michaele Weissman’s 2008 book, “God in a Cup: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Coffee” is a detailed look at how three leaders in the specialty coffee world are constantly in search of their ideal, or perfect coffee. To be honest, it’s more than that. “God in a Cup” is a frank essay on the state of the coffee industry.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Today's Cup of Coffee 3/22/2013
This morning I purchased a bold pick of the day from Starbucks. This was their Tribute Coffee. I have had this before, and I think it's fine. What happened though was not fine.
I thought the coffee had an odd taste to it, like not what I have had before in a Tribute. Still I sipped it. 30 minutes later I felt like I was going to throw up. The smell of the coffee makes me feel dizzy and sick. I tried to drink it, thinking this was just a momentary thing, but now when I drink it, a few minutes later the same feeling comes back.
Bad beans? Bad water? Bad brewing? Can anyone shed light on this?
I have contacted Starbucks to let them know this happened. Will let you know what they say.
Charlie
I thought the coffee had an odd taste to it, like not what I have had before in a Tribute. Still I sipped it. 30 minutes later I felt like I was going to throw up. The smell of the coffee makes me feel dizzy and sick. I tried to drink it, thinking this was just a momentary thing, but now when I drink it, a few minutes later the same feeling comes back.
Bad beans? Bad water? Bad brewing? Can anyone shed light on this?
I have contacted Starbucks to let them know this happened. Will let you know what they say.
Charlie
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Dear White Castle
Dear White Castle,
Your "hamburgers" have a certain reputation for what they do to one's digestive system. Now I see you are selling coffee?
For all that is good in this world, please don't do this to coffee beans! Some poor farmer has broken his back to produce a nice product, and Lord knows what you are doing to it. Please....stop.
Respectfully,
Charlie
Your "hamburgers" have a certain reputation for what they do to one's digestive system. Now I see you are selling coffee?
For all that is good in this world, please don't do this to coffee beans! Some poor farmer has broken his back to produce a nice product, and Lord knows what you are doing to it. Please....stop.
Respectfully,
Charlie
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Coffee Party USA
This morning we were visited by my friend Kris, and an assortment of brewing techniques. We called it our coffee party!
You will see the usual suspects ranging from Chemex to French press. The idea was we would try coffee based on the brewing technique. The two coffees we used were a decaf espresso and a Peruvian coffee, both roasted by Kris.
Our first trial was the espresso, using the Chemex and the Hario. Part of my coffee journey is to learn an understand the various brewing techniques. The more advanced coffee lovers will already know what I am talking about, but the newer people are in the same boat I'm in. So I apologize to those who may be more advanced in the coffee world.
With the Chemex system, coffee will only come into contact with the filter and a non-porous glass. This system is designed to take a lot of the impurities and bitterness out of coffee. In our tasting today, we found that the flavor of the espresso was very mellow. There was little bite to it.
With the Hario, the cone shape adds what they call "depth" to the coffee. There is a larger hole where the coffee drips into the pot. The size of the hole can dictate the change the taste of coffee, based on how it is flowing into the pot.
So which method did we prefer. All three of us decided the Hario made the espresso taste fuller, more like what we would expect an espresso roast to taste like.
Next we compared the Hario to the porcelain drip system(second left in the picture above. The difference between the two systems is the Hario has a larger hole. The porcelain drip system has a tiny hole. Kris told me the porcelain system is one she sees most coffee houses use for a pour over.
Again in this case the Hario seemed to have the better taste, however it was closer this time, and I don't believe it was unanimous. In theory the smaller hole drip process would seem to have a better taste and flavor, because the water has more time to interact with the coffee before it goes into the cup or pot. I will only speak for me, I thought the Hario was much better.
For our next test, we ground the Peruvian coffee, and we used the French Press and the Clever Coffee Dripper.
These systems take more time. The both have a filter which prevents grounds from getting into the coffee. Still some ground can make their way to the bottom of the cup.
I believe we were all in agreement that we liked both of these of all the methods we tried today. The coffee tasted stronger to us. We liked the bite and fullness of the coffee.
I wouldn't turn down any coffee from any of the brewing techniques we had today, but for me, I preferred the French Press the best. It tasted more like coffee from my coffee maker. Of course this may more the more refined drinker cringe by my saying that, but hey, my blog, my likes. :-)
This was a terrific morning. We all got a bit overloaded on coffee. I think professional cuppers and tasters have stronger stomachs than we do. Still it was fascinating to see what a difference a cup of coffee is based on the brewing method.
Charlie
You will see the usual suspects ranging from Chemex to French press. The idea was we would try coffee based on the brewing technique. The two coffees we used were a decaf espresso and a Peruvian coffee, both roasted by Kris.
Our first trial was the espresso, using the Chemex and the Hario. Part of my coffee journey is to learn an understand the various brewing techniques. The more advanced coffee lovers will already know what I am talking about, but the newer people are in the same boat I'm in. So I apologize to those who may be more advanced in the coffee world.
With the Chemex system, coffee will only come into contact with the filter and a non-porous glass. This system is designed to take a lot of the impurities and bitterness out of coffee. In our tasting today, we found that the flavor of the espresso was very mellow. There was little bite to it.
With the Hario, the cone shape adds what they call "depth" to the coffee. There is a larger hole where the coffee drips into the pot. The size of the hole can dictate the change the taste of coffee, based on how it is flowing into the pot.
So which method did we prefer. All three of us decided the Hario made the espresso taste fuller, more like what we would expect an espresso roast to taste like.
Next we compared the Hario to the porcelain drip system(second left in the picture above. The difference between the two systems is the Hario has a larger hole. The porcelain drip system has a tiny hole. Kris told me the porcelain system is one she sees most coffee houses use for a pour over.
Again in this case the Hario seemed to have the better taste, however it was closer this time, and I don't believe it was unanimous. In theory the smaller hole drip process would seem to have a better taste and flavor, because the water has more time to interact with the coffee before it goes into the cup or pot. I will only speak for me, I thought the Hario was much better.
For our next test, we ground the Peruvian coffee, and we used the French Press and the Clever Coffee Dripper.
These systems take more time. The both have a filter which prevents grounds from getting into the coffee. Still some ground can make their way to the bottom of the cup.
I believe we were all in agreement that we liked both of these of all the methods we tried today. The coffee tasted stronger to us. We liked the bite and fullness of the coffee.
I wouldn't turn down any coffee from any of the brewing techniques we had today, but for me, I preferred the French Press the best. It tasted more like coffee from my coffee maker. Of course this may more the more refined drinker cringe by my saying that, but hey, my blog, my likes. :-)
This was a terrific morning. We all got a bit overloaded on coffee. I think professional cuppers and tasters have stronger stomachs than we do. Still it was fascinating to see what a difference a cup of coffee is based on the brewing method.
Charlie
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)